<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheap or Chic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheapchicas.com/2009/02/01/cheap-or-chic-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheapchicas.com/2009/02/01/cheap-or-chic-3/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:56:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3709</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: V</title>
		<link>http://www.cheapchicas.com/2009/02/01/cheap-or-chic-3/comment-page-1/#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapchicas.com/?p=3352#comment-640</guid>
		<description>yuck. yuck. yuck.  This is cheap no doubt about it. The colors are all wrong together.  Not even on a celebrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yuck. yuck. yuck.  This is cheap no doubt about it. The colors are all wrong together.  Not even on a celebrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rere</title>
		<link>http://www.cheapchicas.com/2009/02/01/cheap-or-chic-3/comment-page-1/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Rere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapchicas.com/?p=3352#comment-432</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, this is ugly as hell! The colors make no sense and the whole concept looks like a 12 year old made it for homemaking class in middle school. Lol no offense to anyone that like it =)

Visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.orlandomakeupartist.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tigress Or Tame? Beauty for Wild &amp; Mild Kitties&lt;/a&gt; for makeup giveaways, contests, reviews, freebies, and more!

-Rere</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, this is ugly as hell! The colors make no sense and the whole concept looks like a 12 year old made it for homemaking class in middle school. Lol no offense to anyone that like it =)</p>
<p>Visit <a href="http://www.orlandomakeupartist.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Tigress Or Tame? Beauty for Wild &amp; Mild Kitties</a> for makeup giveaways, contests, reviews, freebies, and more!</p>
<p>-Rere</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FashionWithoutGuilt</title>
		<link>http://www.cheapchicas.com/2009/02/01/cheap-or-chic-3/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>FashionWithoutGuilt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 21:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapchicas.com/?p=3352#comment-329</guid>
		<description>I think it is chic. This is a very classic design and still trendy enough with the color scheme. I love this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is chic. This is a very classic design and still trendy enough with the color scheme. I love this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flaii</title>
		<link>http://www.cheapchicas.com/2009/02/01/cheap-or-chic-3/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>flaii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapchicas.com/?p=3352#comment-328</guid>
		<description>I have to go for &quot;lack of style&quot;.

Forget about the ruffles, the skirt looks totally plain. :S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to go for &#8220;lack of style&#8221;.</p>
<p>Forget about the ruffles, the skirt looks totally plain. :S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hailey Lafone</title>
		<link>http://www.cheapchicas.com/2009/02/01/cheap-or-chic-3/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Hailey Lafone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapchicas.com/?p=3352#comment-326</guid>
		<description>I think it is totally chic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is totally chic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.cheapchicas.com/2009/02/01/cheap-or-chic-3/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapchicas.com/?p=3352#comment-327</guid>
		<description>This dress is poorly constructed and looks like it fits poorly.
 A dress very simular is on sale at ASOS; it is all one color and while the back does not have a hole in the back it is a wonderfully and universally flattering scooped neckline.
It is called the Diane Kruger and is on sale for 26.34. The sizes are extremely limited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This dress is poorly constructed and looks like it fits poorly.<br />
 A dress very simular is on sale at ASOS; it is all one color and while the back does not have a hole in the back it is a wonderfully and universally flattering scooped neckline.<br />
It is called the Diane Kruger and is on sale for 26.34. The sizes are extremely limited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.cheapchicas.com/2009/02/01/cheap-or-chic-3/comment-page-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapchicas.com/?p=3352#comment-325</guid>
		<description>I have to vote for cheap. Maybe if there was just the belt and no ruffle, or monochromatic. What really bothers me is that just a tiny bit of the top color is visible above the belt in the back. It should fall below the belt or many inches above it. Concept... good, execution... bad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to vote for cheap. Maybe if there was just the belt and no ruffle, or monochromatic. What really bothers me is that just a tiny bit of the top color is visible above the belt in the back. It should fall below the belt or many inches above it. Concept&#8230; good, execution&#8230; bad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miwo</title>
		<link>http://www.cheapchicas.com/2009/02/01/cheap-or-chic-3/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Miwo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapchicas.com/?p=3352#comment-324</guid>
		<description>Cheap. The way the back is constructed makes it look like granny underwear is peaking above the skirt. It&#039;s just wrong all over the place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheap. The way the back is constructed makes it look like granny underwear is peaking above the skirt. It&#8217;s just wrong all over the place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.cheapchicas.com/2009/02/01/cheap-or-chic-3/comment-page-1/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapchicas.com/?p=3352#comment-323</guid>
		<description>I think it looks totally cheap.  It looks as though the back and armholes needs to be altered because it doesn&#039;t fit right.
Two colors fine, three colors, especially in a block-like pattern, nope.  It&#039;d make even a beanpole look large.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it looks totally cheap.  It looks as though the back and armholes needs to be altered because it doesn&#8217;t fit right.<br />
Two colors fine, three colors, especially in a block-like pattern, nope.  It&#8217;d make even a beanpole look large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britt</title>
		<link>http://www.cheapchicas.com/2009/02/01/cheap-or-chic-3/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Britt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapchicas.com/?p=3352#comment-322</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going with cheap.  There&#039;s no contrast in the textures.  Looks like something from the 1980s, yes - something a mom would stay up all night making for her teen&#039;s prom.  Perhaps from the living room curtains?

But yes, could be easily remedied. Dramatic back is nice; color scheme and mono-material no good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going with cheap.  There&#8217;s no contrast in the textures.  Looks like something from the 1980s, yes &#8211; something a mom would stay up all night making for her teen&#8217;s prom.  Perhaps from the living room curtains?</p>
<p>But yes, could be easily remedied. Dramatic back is nice; color scheme and mono-material no good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
